- Welcome to Arboleas Community Forum.
Arboleas Community Forum
Recent posts
#11
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by Roger - Today at 16:19:55 PMRegarding the company who has an embargo.
This is Promar.
I have nothing to do with Promar.
But as far as I know there are 3 shareholders of the company.
Cristobal Berbel, who set up the company.
He had been deputy mayor under your father in an earlier PSOE administration.
The other shareholders are, to my understanding, Antonio the former local police officer, and Faustino who has never indicated any political involvement. He in theory runs the company.
In theory because there is little indication that anyone runs it!
So where is the PP link to Promar?
This is Promar.
I have nothing to do with Promar.
But as far as I know there are 3 shareholders of the company.
Cristobal Berbel, who set up the company.
He had been deputy mayor under your father in an earlier PSOE administration.
The other shareholders are, to my understanding, Antonio the former local police officer, and Faustino who has never indicated any political involvement. He in theory runs the company.
In theory because there is little indication that anyone runs it!
So where is the PP link to Promar?
#12
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by JuanC - Today at 16:18:05 PMQuote from: Roger on Today at 16:11:29 PMThat's a decision the residents have to make, not being dictated to by you.
They have to decide the pros and cons.
By the way the land IS URBAN under innovation 14.
Unconsolidated urban, a form that the new Andalusian land law doesnt recognize.
#13
Fantasy Football / Re: Official Fantasy premier l...
Last post by Jellybaby - Today at 16:16:43 PMArboleas Forum Classic League & Forum Head to Head league Week 33
Click on Attachments to enlarge
Click on Attachments to enlarge
#14
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by JuanC - Today at 16:16:12 PMQuote from: Roger on Today at 16:07:09 PMQ2
How did you help?
Los Requenas is the only project and the only reason that the residents have not had to pay is that the land is still owned by the builder.
If people have an afo they own the land so they will have to pay.
Your father confirmed this at a meeting with me in 2018.
With all the developments that the city council did in the ARI areas, those costs had to be paid by the neighbors, as you say. By doing these jobs, the city council saved the neighbors that money.
C/Zoraida was the last street that was made to save the residents of the ARI of La Perla, a total of 300 thousand euros were saved for these neighbors, they can divide it among the houses that are part of the ARI of Perla and that way they will know the savings that each home had due to this last work.
In Los Torres they can make the bill with the lighting and the green area, almost 100 thousand euros between 30 houses. We save more than 3 thousand euros for each neighbor and so on, in all the neighborhoods.
See if the costs of the ARIs can be reduced when the City Council works and collaborates with the neighbors.
#15
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by Roger - Today at 16:11:29 PMThat's a decision the residents have to make, not being dictated to by you.
They have to decide the pros and cons.
By the way the land IS URBAN under innovation 14.
They have to decide the pros and cons.
By the way the land IS URBAN under innovation 14.
#16
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by Roger - Today at 16:07:09 PMQ2
How did you help?
Los Requenas is the only project and the only reason that the residents have not had to pay is that the land is still owned by the builder.
If people have an afo they own the land so they will have to pay.
Your father confirmed this at a meeting with me in 2018.
How did you help?
Los Requenas is the only project and the only reason that the residents have not had to pay is that the land is still owned by the builder.
If people have an afo they own the land so they will have to pay.
Your father confirmed this at a meeting with me in 2018.
#17
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by JuanC - Today at 16:02:45 PMQuote from: Roger on Today at 16:00:59 PMQ1
You obviously do not understand the law.
The legalisation tax is on the property.
That is clear from the parcelisation project for Los Requenas.
So we all know that the builder won't pay, and after 4 years under Spanish law they can't be given to tax bill.
The town hall can't pay itself.
So the debt is on the property.
Check that with any lawyer.
Review your notes, in Los Requenas the promoters have paid. Or go back to studying. Continue with the other questions.
#18
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by Roger - Today at 16:00:59 PMQ1
You obviously do not understand the law.
The legalisation tax is on the property.
That is clear from the parcelisation project for Los Requenas.
So we all know that the builder won't pay, and after 4 years under Spanish law they can't be given to tax bill.
The town hall can't pay itself.
So the debt is on the property.
Check that with any lawyer.
You obviously do not understand the law.
The legalisation tax is on the property.
That is clear from the parcelisation project for Los Requenas.
So we all know that the builder won't pay, and after 4 years under Spanish law they can't be given to tax bill.
The town hall can't pay itself.
So the debt is on the property.
Check that with any lawyer.
#19
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Caixa Bank S€PA Predetermi...
Last post by Lynne - Today at 15:11:42 PMQuote from: Elgin on Today at 13:11:19 PM...and can't find any sign of such a card on their website.
What makes you think you have such a card? Is from a dodgy email?
Neither could I find anything on their website, which I wondered about. When I got home to authenticate my new credit card there were two cards shown, the new credit card and this blue S€PA card with an account number. I was in my account online so it wasn't via an email. Strange, because I've just had another look at my bank account and it's now disappeared, I'm glad I took a print screen of it otherwise I might have thought I was imagining it.
Thanks for your response.
#20
Arboleas General Chatter - Sponsored by / Re: Arboleas politics
Last post by JuanC - Today at 14:56:58 PM5 questions that can clarify all the neighbors' doubts:
- Why is the current government attacking the neighbors and not the developers?
- Why do you suppose that the costs that neighbors must pay in legalization are immutable? The city council can help like we did.
- A client who requested a job from me was surprised to have been tricked into obtaining an AFO by telling him that his land was classified as urban. He wanted to build a small storage room on his plot but, being an AFO, it was prohibited as it was a document that recognizes the illegality of a property. If I were in the ARI I would not have had problems in this regard. What solution does that neighbor have to build up to the 30% occupation of the plot that is allowed for houses with ARIs? I understand that anyone who wants to sell quickly gets an AFO, but answer that question if possible.
- Why does a CHIEF of the company that left embargoes in LOS TORRES, LOS CARRASCOS, EL RINCÓN, as you say, act as a MEMBER OF THE PP in the municipal elections and is a local militant of the PP party? He was one of the sponsors of the PP project. When they look for the promoter to pay, they can't find him, but if it is to 'help' in the electoral campaign, he is there. Can I clarify more, this person, who is a member of the PP of Arboleas, allegedly bought a rustic land in LOS TORRES from a relative of a member of the electoral list of the current PP to build illegal houses, do you know what houses they are? Yes, those of the ARI of Los Torres. Who explains why the promoter's party says that it cannot find the promoter?
- Why do members of the government team refuse to debate in this group?
- Why is the current government attacking the neighbors and not the developers?
- Why do you suppose that the costs that neighbors must pay in legalization are immutable? The city council can help like we did.
- A client who requested a job from me was surprised to have been tricked into obtaining an AFO by telling him that his land was classified as urban. He wanted to build a small storage room on his plot but, being an AFO, it was prohibited as it was a document that recognizes the illegality of a property. If I were in the ARI I would not have had problems in this regard. What solution does that neighbor have to build up to the 30% occupation of the plot that is allowed for houses with ARIs? I understand that anyone who wants to sell quickly gets an AFO, but answer that question if possible.
- Why does a CHIEF of the company that left embargoes in LOS TORRES, LOS CARRASCOS, EL RINCÓN, as you say, act as a MEMBER OF THE PP in the municipal elections and is a local militant of the PP party? He was one of the sponsors of the PP project. When they look for the promoter to pay, they can't find him, but if it is to 'help' in the electoral campaign, he is there. Can I clarify more, this person, who is a member of the PP of Arboleas, allegedly bought a rustic land in LOS TORRES from a relative of a member of the electoral list of the current PP to build illegal houses, do you know what houses they are? Yes, those of the ARI of Los Torres. Who explains why the promoter's party says that it cannot find the promoter?
- Why do members of the government team refuse to debate in this group?